Femtocell Opinion, comment and reviews

Femtocells are irrelevant in many countries

India Femtocell I visited India this week. What’s that got to do with femtocells, you may ask? The point is that the country which will shortly become No.2 by subscribers (ahead of US, behind China) is quite unsuitable for 3G femtocells both now and in the foreseeable future. This focuses the mind on some market segmentation for femtocells.

First some details on the current situation in India:
- Population: 1.1 Billion
- 80% live in rural areas and survive on agriculture
- 39% are illiterate 
- 27% live below the poverty line
- 77% live on less than US$0.50 per day
- The economy is growing at around 8-9% annually (and has done so for a few years), similar to China, but is still far behind in infrastructure – traffic congestion is throttling and there is not yet a metro/underground in the main cities, although some are being built.
- 2% PC penetration

And from a mobile phone perspective:
- It’s all 2G. No 3G licences have yet been awarded.
- It’s GSM. Both the CDMA technology operators (Reliance and Tata) who have a combined share of around 20% are said to be planning GSM technology rollouts, because the technology is cheaper and there is a wider range of handsets.
- It’s growing faster than anywhere else. Over 9 million new subscribers every month, with around 180million subscribers reported today. That’s still a huge growth to catch up with China, which has almost 500M subscribers, increasing by some 4M/month.
- Around 200,000 towers, with around 20% of towers hosting more than one operator’s basestation equipment.
- ARPU figures vary, with a lot of the newer subscribers probably in the US$ 2-4/month bracket, although overall the industry makes around $8/month
- Call rates are in the order of US 2 cent/minute.
- Yankee reports operator share of Bharti 30%, BSNL 18%, Reliance 17%. Vodafone (formerly Hutch) is growing quickly.
- 2G cellular data cards, using fixed price data plans, are becoming popular in a similar way to 3G cards/USB dongles promoted in developed countries. The data rates and capacity are more limited.

Yet from a wired broadband internet position:
- 3 million broadband DSL subscriptions
- 8 million copper loops capable of delivering broadband.
- 10 million dialup internet users.
- Fibre is being laid across the country, but fibre-cuts remain a regular fault

So if we look at the potential for 3G femtocells, we find there is little comfort:
- No 3G licences available yet – this is probably some years off, whilst the country focuses on basic 2G voice/text rollout.
- Virtually no wired broadband to support significant volumes.
- Any 2G femtocells would likely conflict with the tight spectrum reuse and frequency planning of the macro network, so would be discouraged except where deployed and managed directly by the operator in extremely high capacity locations.
- The business case for coverage fill-in doesn’t stack up – broadband is unavailable in areas which don’t have cellular coverage.
- The business case for data in the home is even more difficult, with relatively low levels of domestic computer penetration. There is more likely demand for mobile broadband access via macrocells, using the new HSPA, HSPA+ and LTE technologies when 3G spectrum is made available.

So it’s not a question of deployment of 3G femtocells in the Indian market coming a few years after the developed world. The complete lack of copper loops, and the changing technology that makes it more feasible to deploy wireless broadband than dig up and lay new copper loops. The services that femtocells would offer are therefore more likely to be delivered over the macrocellular network (with microcellular support) in the medium and long term for any developing country. There is some interest in 2G picocells which would be deployed by the operator in enterprise situations to handle high traffic concentrations, but this is a different application, technology and market segment from the 3G proposition.

So what does this say about market segmentation for femtocells? Key factors which would make the product more attractive include:
- Wireline broadband availability/penetration (or even copper loop capacity)
- Mobile subscriber penetration

Some factors which could be considered, but are probably more ancilliary:
- Prepaid versus postpaid mix. This is more related to the adoption of banking services in a given market than anything. So countries where few people have bank accounts, or where credit checks are not easily performed, have been successful with prepaid mobile for up to 99% of customers. This is different from developed markets, where prepaid is considered low ARPU (but not necessarily low profit), increasing market penetration by making it available to almost everyone regardless of credit record, age or fixed abode. Mainly prepaid markets such as Italy should not find this
- PC penetration. Globally, there is somewhere around 1 Billion PC’s used by the world’s 6 Billion population, compared with about 3 Billion mobile phones and 1 Billion fixed lines – we’ll ignore the double counting of work/home PCs or phones to keep it simple. But as we’ve said above, in countries with more PCs and/or laptops the more significant factor is how these can be provided with a broadband connection. If there is no existing copper loop or cable modem, then macrocellular wireless is the only way to go.

So to summarise:

3G femtocells are irrelevant, both now and in the future, for developing countries. They are much more appropriate in countries with higher ARPU, high broadband, PC and mobile takeup, especially North America where there are coverage gaps and high internet usage.
Hits : 8047

Comments   

#1 VE said: 
This doesn't make sense to me exactly. In the article it is stated that:
- 77% live on less than US$0.50 per day

Yet after that:
"Over 9 million new subscribers every month, with around 180million subscribers reported today."

How is that possible?
0 Quote 2008-04-25 15:10
 
#2 Thinkfemtocell said: 
Indian operators are renowned for getting incredibly low price equipment and driving their costs down. Price per minute is in the range of 1 US cent, yet still profitable. Many users have very basic handsets with voice and text only.

Basic handsets are around 20 dollars (see http://www.india-cellular.com/Handset-Prices.htm for examples)
- Reliance sold over 1 million handsets at 19 dollars with an offer a year ago (see http://www.mobileoffers.in/2007_05_01_archive.html). There is also a second hand market which I believe may include many imported from other countries.

Most subscribers are prepaid, which again reduces costs due to lack of defaulters, and improves cashflow.

Many of the over 180 million subscribers to date may well be above the 70c/day income level - there is a very wide range of income.
0 Quote 2008-04-25 19:03
 
#3 Vipen Mahajan said: 
Things are fast changing. lowcost Android 3G with WIFi and AGPS are available at Rs 5000 a handset. Chinese phones and Indian branded phones are driving the prices down. Perhaps India may just leapfrog the PC era and jump straight to smartphones and tablets !
0 Quote 2011-08-08 18:34
 
#4 Vishnu Prasad R said: 
The current situation at India is very different.
Almost all operators have 3G licence and 3G user base is growing fast. The state owned BSNL stopped its 2G data palns and upgraded all 2G users to 3G automatically. Still there won't be any market for Femtocells in India. Here are the reasons why:

1. Areas with low mobile signal reception also lacks wired broadband. 3G is now avaialble at almost all small cities. If an area doesn't ahve 3G signal reception the chances are that it doesn't ahve wired broadband either.
2. Most people in India are too poor to affoard a Femtocell at home. As said most of the connections are prepaid. Incoming calls & sms are free in India. And call rates are very cheap. So most people pay less than 10 cent per year.
0 Quote 2013-11-19 17:35
 
#5 Abhishek said: 
Quoting Vishnu Prasad R:
2. Most people in India are too poor to affoard a Femtocell at home. As said most of the connections are prepaid. Incoming calls & sms are free in India. And call rates are very cheap. So most people pay less than 10 cent per year.


^

surely you meant 10 dollars per year for the average user. 10 cents per year is an incorrect, probably placed by mistake, figure.

the problem lies with unreliable broadband. on paper, broadband may seem to penetrate faster than ever before, but even several sections of major cities still remain depraved of broadband due to inefficient infrastructure, road network, electrical outages, etc. So implementing broadband there would be waste of investment for the ISPs. And where they are able to lay properly, their core suffers from lack of professionalism, and hollow promise of quality.

femtocell is not seen as NECESSARY for the current techno-business model for all mobile providers in India. Instead, they are all for LTE, WiMAX, the upcoming Wifi standards, etc.

-contd..
0 Quote 2016-06-15 22:31
 
#6 Abhishek said: 
Nearly 10 years since the advent of Satellite-enabl ed cable service in India but still all the players have come to the mutual agreement of holding back to provide internet connectivity through satellite which many satellite providers overseas have been providing for a long time now. Though all of them will appreciate all the advice and feedback you give them but they will do nothing about it.

THE CORE BUSINESS MODEL OF MOST MAJOR TECHNOLOGY BASED BUSINESSES IN INDIA WHICH DEALS WITH MILLIONS OF CONSUMERS IN WHATEVER ASPECT, HAVE ONE THING IN COMMON. TO FRAGMENT THE PROGRESS AND REACH OF TECHNOLOGY TO THE MASSES AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.

-An Indian Who Prefers To Speak The Truth
0 Quote 2016-06-15 22:33
 
  • 4

    more

    Residential

    Residential

    A significant number of users continue to report poor mobile coverage in their homes. There will always be areas which are uneconomic for mobile operator to reach. They range from rural areas

    ...
  • 4

    more

    Enterprise

    Enterprise

    The term Enterprise addresses any non-residential in-building including hotels, convention centres, transport hubs, offices, hospitals and retail outlets. It's not just intended for businesses to

    ...
  • 4

    more

    Urban

    Urban

    Urban small cells (sometimes also named metrocells) are compact and discrete mobile phone basestations, unobstrusively located in urban areas. They can be mounted on lampposts, positioned on the

    ...
  • 4

    more

    Rural

    Rural

    A rural small cell is a low power mobile phone base station designed to bring mobile phone service to small pockets of population in remote rural areas. These could be hamlets, small villages or

    ...
Categories
Backhaul Timing and Sync Chipsets Wi-Fi LTE TDD Regional

Popular Categories

Follow us on...

footer-logo

Search