Femtocell Operator News and Opinons

Some thoughts on SFR femtocell launch

 

 

sfr-logoSFR France, part of the Vodafone group, launched their domestic femtocell service last week with a blaze of publicity. For a one-off price of 199 Euros (about $300) you can buy a femtocell with no ongoing charges, but no discounted rates or other financial rewards.

It’s being promoted on the basis of poor in-building coverage

Network operators face a dilemma when promoting their femtocell services. Should they highlight the poor in-building service available today on their network, raising the issue that maybe their customers should think about churning across to a network with better coverage? Femtocells allow them to differentiate by offering excellent in-building coverage, even in buildings which would be difficult to provide service to any other way.

There’s been a lot of active pushback from bloggers/commenters and others about the concept of paying to workaround deficiencies in the mobile network. This is particularly true in some parts of the US where coverage is patchy and prices remain high. Initial reaction in France seems to be that they like the idea, but not the price.

And it makes femtocells sexy for sure

It is said that the words “free” and “sex” always increase market takeup when advertising. SFR haven’t chosen to give their product away free, and have instead invested in a professionally shot video and associated materials to promote the offer.

Whether this is good enough to boast to your friends about remains to be seen.

I’m still of the opinion that operators aren’t promoting the additional benefits apart from basic coverage – the reality is these femtocells give very high quality voice and very high speed data response. I’ve previously compared femtocells with HDTV, suggesting that operators could position this as a premium service rather than just fixing the bits that are broken. To continue the analogy, femtocells are not just like replacing the roof-top antenna for your TV, instead it's more like buying satellite or cable HDTV service.

That back-office stuff isn’t fully sorted

SFR are charging some 6 Euros each time you want to change any existing entries in the  “white list” of permitted phones that can use your femtocell (it's 4 Euros per call to customer services plus 2 Euros per number changed). But this only applies after the first month, and adding new numbers is free. This suggests that they still have some manual processes involved in updating the configuration of each femtocell. This is disappointing – I would have allowed (say) 2-3 updates per year free of charge, and only penalise those who are updating more frequently with some higher charges.

Given the cost of handling a customer care call might be much higher (let’s guess at 10-20 Euros or more per call), the potential for a commercial loss here has taken priority. I would have thought that if it’s found to be high after running for a few months, then this would justify an automated solution via a webpage.

The time to process each update is far too long at 48 hours. Say someone visits you for the weekend - they may have left before your update takes effect. Compare that with allowing access to your WiFi by just telling them the password (or even manually adding their MAC address into your WIFi router admin page). This either needs to be open access or managed within minutes through a simple online webpage. I guess these issues will be worked through in due course as the technology matures.

The lack of any special tariff plans or other discounted calls would have made it easier to deploy, but may put off some users unless they have a bundled minutes/data package. This is almost exactly the same deal as Vodafone offer in the UK, except for the charge to change your whitelist.

It’s a first for Ubiquisys

The solution which NEC have put together comprising Ubiquisys femtocell, Kineto Wireless Femto gateway and some other components has been trialled by several operators. Will Franks from Ubiquisys is proud to see this first full commercial launch with the full marketing promotion behind it.

It’s not the same vendor as used by Vodafone in the UK, indicating they haven’t made a group-wide vendor selection for femtocells yet. Once the standards are implemented by all vendors, they would be open to use multiple femtocell vendors in each country.

This NEC solution has been trialled by other operators, such as Telefonica O2 and TDC Denmark, so we could see some other further launches in coming months.

Some other minor points

  • It works with broadband from any supplier at speeds as low at 512kbit/s
  • You are not allowed to move it (say to a second home)
  • Several broadband internet modems and specific 3G phone models are declared incompatible with the femtocell, suggesting there has been extensive field testing
  • They make a big deal of not co-locating the femtocell within 1.5 metres of a WiFi access point.

 

SFR 3G Femtocell website

Hits : 10028

Comments   

#1 Hayat Qureshi said: 
Femtocell is a fantastic technology specially when we speak about the deployment in the rural area. At the momnent, it got alot of interferences issues to tackle, but all in all, Femto are fantastic cells.
0 Quote 2009-12-02 20:43
 
#2 A said: 
Does anyone know what this 1.5m restriction to WiFi AP ?
0 Quote 2009-12-04 14:58
 
#3 ThinkFemtocell said: 
@A: Good question - I wondered about that too. I've polled a few people about this. The suggestion is that some WiFi access points (in order to be very low cost) may be less tolerant to nearby RF. This statement may be a "belt and braces" protection measure to ensure good performance all round, without publicly saying anything bad about WiFi per se. When you think that many handsets combine 2G/3G and WiFi (the iPhone and Blackberry being prime examples), there is no reason why these can't be made to work together in harmony.

@Lecturer: Glad you share my enthusiasm for the technology. I get emails from people around the world asking where they can get their hands on a femtocell. There is certainly latent demand for the solution. I think many in the Femto Forum would disagree with your statement around interference - their studies and field trials suggest that this is manageable using a number of mitigation techniques now built into today's products.
0 Quote 2009-12-04 18:27
 
#4 seksek said: 
do you know about the regulatory in franc consdering femtocells?
considered as a base station?
nees security certificat?
fee collected by the government?
etc.
0 Quote 2009-12-14 12:57
 
  • 4

    more

    Residential

    Residential

    A significant number of users continue to report poor mobile coverage in their homes. There will always be areas which are uneconomic for mobile operator to reach. They range from rural areas

    ...
  • 4

    more

    Enterprise

    Enterprise

    The term Enterprise addresses any non-residential in-building including hotels, convention centres, transport hubs, offices, hospitals and retail outlets. It's not just intended for businesses to

    ...
  • 4

    more

    Urban

    Urban

    Urban small cells (sometimes also named metrocells) are compact and discrete mobile phone basestations, unobstrusively located in urban areas. They can be mounted on lampposts, positioned on the

    ...
  • 4

    more

    Rural

    Rural

    A rural small cell is a low power mobile phone base station designed to bring mobile phone service to small pockets of population in remote rural areas. These could be hamlets, small villages or

    ...
Categories
Backhaul Timing and Sync Chipsets Wi-Fi LTE TDD Regional

Popular Categories

Follow us on...

footer-logo

Search