Small Cell Chipset Vendor Landscape 2013

Article Index

 

4G LTE

Much higher processing power is being demanded for LTE for several reasons:

  1. 4G technology itself is more demanding than 3G, partly because it uses more spectrum per carrier (10MHz or 20MHz vs 5MHz for 3G)
  2. The concurrent user capacity of the largest small cells is increasing, with metrocells that can handle 32 or 64 active users now quite common.
  3. Operators want metrocells to have a long lifetime, and so are keen to have a lot of spare "headroom" available to handle future LTE-Advanced features delivered by subsequent software upgrades
  4. The nirvana of a combined 3G/LTE small cell driven by a single chip

This has attracted several groups of chipset vendors to the party:

a) Those upsizing from 3G femtocells, such as Picochip, Broadcom etc.
b) Those downsizing from 3G/4G macrocells, such as TI, Freescale
c) New entrants such as Cavium, some bringing a background in WiMax that is relevant for LTE.

The key players (in alphabetical order) in our view are:

  • Broadcom
  • Cavium
  • Freescale
  • Mindspeed (since acquired by Intel)
  • Qualcomm
  • Texas Instruments

There are a few others on the sidelines promoting their solutions at conferences.

Broadcom

Exploiting their growing success in residential Femtocells, Broadcom's latest release spans the range from single mode residential 8 user chip through to the high capacity 3G/LTE multimode capable of 128 LTE users and 32 3G users simultaneously.

A key design benefit for existing customers is that their latest chips continue to support their earlier 3G software interfaces. This will substantially reduce time/cost/risk to migrate to this device and allow a single codebase to be compatible with existing products.

The BCM61630 SoC integrates the RF front end, GPS onboard to reduce cost, with volume production slated for 1H2013. This sits alongside larger capacity chipsets for multimode 3G/LTE - the BCM61730 for residential, BCM61750 targeted at enterprise and BCM61760 for metrocells.

Software support from Node-H for both 3G and LTE, recently expanded to include Radisys for LTE. mimoOn have integrated their PHY and also offer a Layer 2/3 stack.

Cavium

Cavium's OCTEON Fusion chipset support up to 128 concurrent users and has been commercially deployed in Korea by both KT and SK Telecom. The current CN7130 product supports LTE only, but 3G is planned for release during 2013. Today's chips use 64bit MIPS processors, but the company has signed a deal with ARM last year that might see these replaced in the future.

Somewhat unusually, the company has developed its own LTE Layer 2/3 stack as part of its software solution. They offer an end-to-end design "ready to manufacture" which also incorporates Symmetricom timing/sync software, TR.069 client and SON.

The company is aiming at products with capacities for 16 users and above, targeting the enterprise and Metrocell market rather than residential.

Their standard LTE reference design uses the ADI (Analog Devices) RF front end, delivering 100mW RF per antenna which achieves a useful range of up to 250 metres. Higher RF power designs are also offered.

TD-LTE will require software development and is a roadmap item.

Freescale

With a heritage of supplying chips for both handsets and wireless infrastructure, this former Motorola subsidiary has tailored its QorIQ range of processors to the needs of small cell designs. The chipset family offers capacity ranging from 8/16 concurrent users for small cells up to thousands for macrocells. Freescale offers both baseband and RF chipsets.

Freescale has developed their own Layer 1 PHY for LTE and collaborates with others for the Layer 2/3 software.

Those products relevant to small cell designers will be:

The BSC9131 which supports 8 to 16 users for any of LTE (FDD or TDD) 3G WCDMA or CDMA.

The BSC9132 which supports up to 100 concurrent users also for any of LTE (FDD or TDD) 3G WCDMA or CDMA has been selected by ip.access for their dual mode 3G/LTE E-100 product.

Intel (formerly Mindspeed and Picochip)

Mindspeed already had established several design wins for LTE prior to acquiring Picochip, who had led in 3G. The company has ported the 3G Picochip firmware across to their Transcede chipset, making it dual mode. They demonstrated concurrent 3G and LTE operation, and also showed the LTE-Advanced Carrier Aggregation feature at MWC in February 2013.

Their longer term roadmap includes the T4400 which will offer up to 400 concurrent LTE users and 128 3G sessions simultaneously with products due to sample before end 2013.

CEVA DSP cores and clusters of ARM Cortex A15 scalar processors are embedded to provide high performance. Mindspeed have developed their own PHY Layer 1 for both 3G and LTE, and also partner with Aricent for LTE software.

Commercially deployed in Korea, winning an award for the first commercial LTE small cell deployment.

Intel acquired the wireless assets of Mindspeed in December 2013, and have since stabilised the business.

Qualcomm

This company dominates LTE smartphone chipsets. It's done a lot of marketing on Small Cells and HetNets, with advanced research on concepts branded as UltraSON, Neighbourhood Small Cells, HSPA+ Range Extension and seamless 3G/4G/Wi-Fi integration. A quick search of their website didn't uncover specific chipsets that address anything outside the 3G residential femtocell yet, so it remains to be seen exactly what physical products Qualcomm will bring to market in this field.

Texas Instruments

TI continue to be a mainstream vendor of chipsets for macrocells, as part of a multi-billion dollar business supplying DSPs and other embedded processing chips to the industry. Their Keystone architecture stretches between high end LTE and multi-mode 3G/LTE small cells through to the largest macrocells and allows the same software to be used throughout.

Keystone incorporates multiple ARM Cortex A15 cores and TMS320C66 DSPs together with specialised accelerator hardware. Backhaul functionality for IPSec and Ethernet and their own timing/sync solution are also included.

While this might make their solution somewhat heavyweight for residential femtocells, it should suit mainstream RAN vendors who need to support a mix of macro/micro/metrocell products using the same underlying platform.

Partnerships with software vendors support both 3G and LTE technologies, but the company announced their own in-house LTE PHY layer 1 earlier in 2013.

Product variants include the TMS320C6612 and 6614 for enterprise and smaller metrocells; alongside the 6636 for larger metrocells.

Ubquisys announced selection of TI for their flagship tri-mode product which was demonstrated at MWC 2013.

Purewave also announced TI selection for their LTE small cells in May 2012.

ZTE has also publicly selected TI for their small cell product range.

4G TD-LTE

Although developed primarily by the Chinese wireless industry, this technology has already been adopted and deployed elsewhere (e.g. Softbank, Japan). It is much closer to the FDD LTE standard that was its 3G counterpart and is in a much better position to become popular in other countries. Large scale deployment of TD-LTE is likely in China from 2013, and this could include significant numbers of metrocells and other small cells. It is already being used to backhaul thousands of public access Wi-Fi hotspots.

Mindspeed appears to be the leading reference design for this technology today and have been adopted in most of the publicly visible designs at this stage. They were demonstrating TD-LTE at Mobile World Congress. Some of the other vendors tell me that they could invest in adapting their chipsets to support TDD mode, but most seem reluctant to do so at this early stage – presumably they see greater long term commercial rewards by investing in mainstream FDD mode first. Small cell vendors will be keen to have a choice of competing chipset vendors, and this seems likely once the size and timing of the market opportunity is more concrete.

SUMMARY

The residential 3G femtocell market remains dominated today by Mindspeed and Broadcom. The latter seem to be increasing their market share with continued investment that drives down total cost, such as combining baseband and RF into a single chip package.

Now that small cell vendors develop their LTE small cells, they will be keeping an eye on how those designs can evolve to support multi-mode 3G/LTE in the future. Here again, Broadcom has a good story with a platform that can support either 3G or LTE by software configuration. TI is one of the most advanced with a comprehensive, powerful architecture that has expanded to include firmware and related scope. Cavium are one to watch with very high capacity and in-house software solution. Other vendors may be further advanced in their LTE programs and a few have demonstrated concurrent multimode to date.

But with operator looking for long term high performance and capacity that can cope with future LTE-Advanced and other features through software updates, it may be the high end macrocell chip suppliers who can be the most convincing.

Cavium and Mindspeed both have a strong story to tell about how their solutions can deliver the kind of throughput and peak performance demanded, and are up against TI and Freescale who both have a track record and investment funding to match.

Hits : 24526

Comments   

#1 Mike said: 
David,

nice article, it is really a conundrum when you do a "nivana" chip with WCDMA and LTE - LTE is more suited to processors and reconfig while WCDMA needs much more hardware acceleration for chip rate processing and is impossible to do with a processor. Interestingly Cavium don't have WCDMA (I wonder about whether they will meet their 2013 deadline), Qualcomm no doubt has a 4G-LTE design (they need it for testing handsets anyway) but there is no rush in my view. Other companies that could be involved include MIMOon for LTE PHY software stack, InterfereX for WCDMA modem design, and the legacy chip FPGA chip vendors Altera and Xilinx (don't discount their clout and market influence).
0 Quote 2013-05-08 02:52
 
#2 ThinkSmallCell said: 
@Mike. Thanks for the positive feedback. I've no doubt that in the long term, several (if not all) of these vendors will get to a so-called nirvana chip - some already have. The investment is substantial - many $10's of millions, so I don't see any new players coming out of left field. It's not just the chip itself of course, you need the full eco-system of PHY, Layer 2/3, testing etc. Some of the smaller companies may provide those parts. But the low target cost of the hardware will I think preclude FPGA being used in the vast majority of small cells - it really needs some dedicated hardware to meet the price/performan ce metrics except for niche applications.
+1 Quote 2013-05-09 09:57
 
#3 Thomas said: 
Will this technology every take off commercially? Mindspeed has been touting it for years but when I look at last quarter’s results I see a measly 2.5 million in sales for all their wireless systems - this is after the acquisition of Piccochip. Seems like it will be forever before we see any real results.
+2 Quote 2013-05-14 00:21
 
#4 Kyle said: 
Hi David,

Good information inside.

For 3G WCDMA L1 (PHY) vendor, do you know anyone based on TI platform?

Regards,
Kyle
0 Quote 2014-02-03 00:31
 
#5 Peter said: 
Hi David:
Which chipset solution is easier for new comer to start? TI? Freescale?Broad com?Cavium?
0 Quote 2014-07-21 11:17
 
#6 ThinkSmallCell said: 
@Peter: I'd need more information about your product requirements before answering that question - this is probably a more important factor in chipset selection than easiest to start with. If a complete newcomer, then I'd suggest a smaller and simpler product, which would favour Broadcom. You should also talk with the software solution vendors, such as Radisys, to understand the total scope of components needed. I can offer private consultancy to assist you in your decision making process - just get in touch via the contact page.
0 Quote 2014-07-25 12:26
 
  • 4

    more

    Residential

    Residential

    A significant number of users continue to report poor mobile coverage in their homes. There will always be areas which are uneconomic for mobile operator to reach. They range from rural areas

    ...
  • 4

    more

    Enterprise

    Enterprise

    The term Enterprise addresses any non-residential in-building including hotels, convention centres, transport hubs, offices, hospitals and retail outlets. It's not just intended for businesses to

    ...
  • 4

    more

    Urban

    Urban

    Urban small cells (sometimes also named metrocells) are compact and discrete mobile phone basestations, unobstrusively located in urban areas. They can be mounted on lampposts, positioned on the

    ...
  • 4

    more

    Rural

    Rural

    A rural small cell is a low power mobile phone base station designed to bring mobile phone service to small pockets of population in remote rural areas. These could be hamlets, small villages or

    ...
Categories
Backhaul Timing and Sync Chipsets Wi-Fi LTE TDD Regional

Popular Categories

Follow us on...

footer-logo

Search